Aurora Acquisition Corp (AURC)

[poiuyt20011]

Have you looked at the previous TA?

How much more proof do you need?

Saying the TA is the WORST is not libel, when the TA has had so many serious issues and has been involved in quite a few shams.

The previous TA is well known on wallstreet as being very dubious. It is something known by most everybody.

As far as the new TA, I do not think enough is known at this point.

I will say it is odd that the new TA knows nothing about the divy and wants to refer you back to the company for info on the buyout.

(Where is your evidence for this libelous assertion?

"yes we do, AURC is using the worst of the worst TA's")

Why does everybody demand 'proof' of anything negative posted, but nobody demands proof of the positive stuff posted?

Looking at the facts, there has been far more positive stuff posted and not very much of it had any proof and it still doesn't. Yet people do not want proof of the positives and only want the negative stuff proven?

IMO, at this stage, the company and those that touted the company with all the unproven speculative junk, are the ones that now bare the burden of proof.