InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 96
Posts 7095
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/10/2006

Re: Guardian post# 53475

Monday, 07/16/2007 3:14:57 PM

Monday, July 16, 2007 3:14:57 PM

Post# of 82105
ahhh, this makes me think thoughtful things.

i guess i'll put it into a question basis,,,,,,,

is it true that ANY imbalances (shorts) on the trading books of wwcd , or whatever gbdx was called prior to gbdx obtaining control of it, will be REQUIRED to be covered / balanced with gbdx going private?

does it work like that? i would think it would.
if it does, then, we could see a double naked short? oh my