Wow, I've been away from the board and now trying to catch up. So, parents, I think you may have been a little too hard on slim and rocket. I can easily see why they are frustrated, this stock is somewhat of a gamble. Even though it appears, from the share price, that none of us have any cards worth betting on, I believe we all have pocket pairs that will turn into a full house, if we can all hang in long enough for the flop.
Our pocket pairs represent the technology the company is developing, and the flop represents this country's need to be free of fossil fuels.
Someone mentioned this in an earlier post, but I will reinforce. A lot has been posted here about hydrogen cars, fuel cells, etc. But from what I can tell, both hydrogen combustion and fuel cells are not nearly efficient as electric cars with electric motors. So in the end, I think electricity will win out. Besides, transporting and storing hydrogen requires way too much energy itself, making the process even less efficient. Fuel cell technology is not developed, and this may change, but fuel cells have a short life time, and are fragile (car hits a bump, need a new fuel cell). So as of now, I believe the answer for automobiles is electricity. So where does nnlx and hydrogen come in??
We can not afford to continue to produce electricity from fossil fuels. We should use fuel cells, but the fuel cells should not be in cars, but at the hydrogen-producing, wastewater-cleaning microbial plant. The hydrogen produced from the bacteria should be converted into electricity on the spot, and fed into the grid of the power plant. Thus providing cheap electricity for cars and houses/buildings/city. Automobiles aside, if hydrogen could replace fossil fuels for electricity production (and thus power houses/cities), the cost of gasoline would drop plenty. Ultimately, we would want our electric cars to use that electricity as well, because I believe in "being green".
So this is why I think nnlx is an excellent investment. Any other form of hydrogen production is messy, or inefficient. JMO
