Sunday, January 11, 2004 10:00:22 PM
You quite recently stated that you were constrained from divulging company information that you possessed to this board , infering non-disclosure constraints.
I understood that to mean that you had a relationship with DNAP that placed you in possession of information that you were not permitted to divulge to the public.
If this is the case then you have, by definition, a personal stake in the success of DNAP that surpasses others on this forum.
This undermines any board perception of objectivity on your part. It does not detract at all from your incredible contribution to this board. It just adds that 'pinch of salt' caveat to the contributioin.
If you have no such relationship, then I must have misread your post. Feel free to elaborate. I'm sure you know the one we are discussing. If not I will be glad to go back through the archive and find it.
best regards,
frog
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM