Hi Replevin...why don't we try to work things out between us?
From your first appearance here, you have accused me of wrongdoing and vague crimes relating to NCVT for which you provide absolutely no proof. I have always responded politely. If you would like a more harmonious IHUB experience, I suggest you revise your posting style and try to clean up your (terrible) research.
The trouble is, you make wild allegations at my expense but present no facts. Therefore, your posts are seriously lacking in credibility. While I can tolerate a few personal attacks from you, I must admit I am curious to learn whether your posts are designed to help shareholders, or help the people who instigated the NCVT fraud. Others want to know. too. In my opinion, it seems they support the fraudsters. People who committed REAL CRIMES for which we have supporting PROOF.
1. For example, can you repost the statement in which I supposedly refused your kind offer to meet with an attorney? You can't - because I didn't. So your previous post, in which you state I "refused," contains at least one untruth at my expense.
2. The other nite we were overwhelmed with your outrageous, poorly researched posts that contained all sorts of untruths presented as fact. I allowed at least one version of each of your posts to stand, but removed repeats because they were off-topic. Other posts were deleted by IHUB admin. In response, I sent you a very nice private message urging you to remain on-topic.
But you just wrote, "I have mail from Serfdom telling me to remove any personal references or he deletes." So now we see your previous post contains 2 untruths.
3. In your previous post, you stated that I have "sponsors." A third untruth, with no supporting facts. Credibility dropping like a rock now.
4. "He will hear more about that from me. Also, I will be going to Chicago or thereabouts as I said, if he would like to make these allegations directly to me"
Now we see you posting vauge threats against another poster. Credibility GONE.
I think, if you will re-read my previous posts to you last night, you will find that I merely ask you simple questions based on things I notice in your posts. I do not present them as fact. You choose not to reply, and that's fine with me.
I am more than happy to discuss NCVT with you at length - but before I do, you're going to have to publish productive - not destructive - posts.
AI
