InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 13539
Next 10
Followers 39
Posts 5944
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 02/05/2007

Re: easymoney101 post# 156

Wednesday, 07/04/2007 11:37:44 AM

Wednesday, July 04, 2007 11:37:44 AM

Post# of 13539
I watched the Hoboken video and the 5 part september series and I need to watch both again several times before I comment.

I won't go into details about my profession but I wil lsay that I am an engineer and have designed steel structures, I am fully aware of the properties of steel (and concrete). I know what happens to steel when it melts, and when it is stressed beyong it's yield point. What I can say is that some of the points made in the Hoboken video are not correct.

However, saying that, I am blown away (no pun) regarding the squibs, flashes, debris trajectories, kinetic energy and all of the other arguments.

Regarding the arguments about "probability" I do also see some holes in the argument. One should never argue that the "probability" of simultaneous squibs is unlikely and thus must have been man-made. This is a fasle asssumption. The TIMING of the squibs and the sequence do not prove detonations. The FLASH (heat) does.

Anyway, I need to watch more and review my engineering books before I comment in any more detail.

This is fascinating. I'm looking forward to adding some scientific rigor.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.