InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 248
Posts 26046
Boards Moderated 13
Alias Born 06/14/2006

Re: boogaloo post# 10

Tuesday, 07/03/2007 2:14:53 AM

Tuesday, July 03, 2007 2:14:53 AM

Post# of 45
SEEMS TO ME THEY ARE NOT TALKING PERIOD, for an outfit seemingly interested in protecting the public they have dropped the ball conclusively. In fact, some of the companies suspended had already prior to the suspension issued press releases warning the public of the spam THEMSELVES!

SO IN MY WAY OF THINKING THEY ACTED RATHER HASTILY AND UNDER THE BLANKET OF GENERALITY.

IF the intention was to stop spam, in this way, they did not conduct their campaign effectively as the real perpetrators would then have escaped unscathed. I believe it is obvious they hit the mark in some cases, but in others missed completely.

But the real injustice is to the public, as far as the public can see, nothing was done, i have yet to hear of any follow up some 4 months later. Considering this all began last august, they are coming up on a year of inaction.

I wonder how many millions of shareholders cash they destroyed?

If the purpose of their existence is the protection of the shareholding public, this is chalked up to yet another blatant failure on their part.

Mind you they balked on the GF provisions for 73 years, so I suppose we owe them some more time to get er done.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.