Dew, I think Migenix has a lot more in its pipline than is reflected in a 40 cent share price. But in regard to celgosivir...you describe its non-responder results as "not bad' and a NZ virologist describes them as "encouraging". It is no magic bullet...but I don't think there is a magic bullet. It looks like the SOC will be a combination regime of possibly 5 or 6 compounds(as with HIV?). As first(and only?) in class I simply think it will be seen as deserving more research by some BP...and I would rather see a number of companies looking at the data from the non-responder and upcoming niave interim report than Schering alone. I think shareholders stand to gain more out an auction than the former agreement with Schering. It is a very competitive and huge market ($9-10B by 2010)and every little edge could be very important...and some BP may have something that celgosivir is even more synergistic with than Scherings compounds. Only time will tell.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.