Scooby, I really take offense at your post. While it is true that I believe that we have one very weak link in our structure, I have always supported CYGX to the fullest, and have invested in it from the very beginning. If being as objective as possible (something you have never been accussed of) is bashing, then I indeed plead guilty.
I have supported this company and fought on its behalf for many years. Where were you when we were under daily attack by bashers who indeed succeeded in beating us down? I don't recall you offering any defense for the company. I spent many months in getting an agreement with those bashers and detractors, and basically used only the truth about the vector.
Although I enjoy your enthusiasm, I can find no era in which you have ever made objective posts. Rah-Rah is okay, but you seem dedicated to the osterich theory of just not acknowledging anything that is either amiss or could be handled better. To read your posts, one would be led to believe that EVERYTHING is operating at optimum efficiency. That is just not true. Of course, it is not true with any other business entity in the world.
Yes, I still dislike the idea of having more than one active corporate employee on the Board of Directors. My belief is that it should be the CEO and that he should NOT be Chairman of the Board, but be there to take direction from the Board.
If I were a basher of this company, believe me I would have long ago made an attack that would have been felt.
CYGX is sitting on the threshold of a "bold new world" and may very well have the key to the future of the entire practice of medicine ... both for homo sapiens and other mammals.
I don't mind being attacked as you attacked me, but for crying out loud, at least do it in an honest manner and be factual.
AI
