InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 99
Posts 7760
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/15/2006

Re: ZigZagZen post# 273567

Friday, 06/29/2007 9:07:41 AM

Friday, June 29, 2007 9:07:41 AM

Post# of 311068
What SLJB has is a 'Lack of transparency' which will be addressed with a quickness in the weeks to come.

First of all, where did you get solid information that SLJB's transparency will be addressed quickly in the weeks to come. More third party hearsay from company officials? Though I must admit, I agree that there will be considerable transparency when the OSC renders its findings.

Also, transparency is not the issue with this company. WHAT IS AT ISSUE HERE IS BACKING UP ITS PRIOR FALSE CLAIMS WHICH ENTICED MANY OF US, INCLUDING MOST OF THE "TRUE LONGS", TO INVEST IN THE COMPANY TO BEGIN WITH. That is fraudulent misrepresentation, any way you spin it.

You will most likely find that any audit produced by SLJB now will fall far short of that objective (substantiating its prior public claims of a $15-16 mil net profit). It seems that the "true longs" are willing to forego the truth of what occurred in the past (grandiose false claims) in the desperate hope that they can merely recoup their investments, all the while spouting false bravado that the company is mending its ways and will, through improving its future bottom line, make up for its prior shortfalls and "mistakes".

WHAT A CROCK and a sad commentary on the comforts of a delusional world of denial.






The important thing is not to stop questioning.
(Albert Einstein)