By: dr_biffnix
27 Jun 2007, 07:06 PM EDT
Msg. 4933 of 4933
Jump to msg. #
By: ATXMAN
14 Mar 2006, 02:23 PM EST
Msg. 239408 of 239485
Jump to msg. #
Raiderman and Capnmike, sirs just a couple of points if I may. First of all Raiderman I do love your take on everything as it is always good for CDEX. However this time your wrong and it is not the first time (are you sure your not Tomsheboy). Infrigment of a patent is very serious and has nothing to do with your logic, plain and simple the plaintiff had it first and just wants to protect their's. Now let's think for a minute, the suit was filed last week, the company notified CDEX in January (was MP still running the show), MP walks away with no feedback to the plaintiff and now this. Raiderman wonder who has the deep pockets to fight this and keep it in court? Wonder who will give first? Quite the scam artist you are.
Capnmike, sir it is quite amazing as if you look at the last time you quit posting was 3 days before the downfall of Loch (quite a track record)and then announce the day before you are going to cut way back on posting and then CDEX gets hit with a major lawsuit. Also you never did answer my question in regards how you produced a press release before it came out (remember the Washington affair). I just don't know why you don't let the people here know the truth that you are a insider and was told what to place and when to place. Don't forget we do know some of the same people. This is quite an interesting tale you weave.
Thank You
----------------------------------------------------
By: ATXMAN
25 Jan 2004, 07:13 PM EST
Msg. 203663 of 239485
Jump to msg. #
Raiderman, sir I thought I would ask you another question (since you never answered my last one). You just stated in your post over on the CDEX board, that MP was a respected Washington attorney. I was wondering where you came up with that? Is it respectable of him not to inform the firm he worked for that he was a paid consultant to Loch Harris?
Bottom line is that a respectable way of doing business?
Thank You
-------------------------------------------------------------
By: ATXMAN
18 Jan 2004, 01:33 PM EST
Msg. 202952 of 239485
Jump to msg. #
MP sir if you are such a "God fearing" man why have you not come clean with the facts and truths about your previous relationships with Loch, W&S, the partnerships you and the boys were in, etc. You speak of God on a daily basis but you do not have the guts to tell the truth to your fellow man, your shareholders, etc. MP you belong in the same category as Jim and Tammy Faye B., Jimmy S., Jessie J., and Al S. I guess people such as yourselves enjoy playing off weakness of others and try to make a buck out of it.
MP morally you are one corrupt man.
Thank You
---------------------------------------------------------
By: ATXMAN
19 Oct 2003, 06:40 PM EDT
Msg. 194070 of 239485
Jump to msg. #
Hello everyone it has been a few months since my last post and I notice some things have changed and others have not.
I see the distribution for the CDEX shares is beginning to take place and that has taken me by surprise. To this day I strongly believe that both companies are complete but controlled "scams".
I have read so much about the integrity of the CEO but no one again questions his path as for years only a handful question the path of Loch's CEO. Everyone presumes that he "left" his law firm on his accord and was not pushed out, I believe that shareholders should look into his firms association with Loch Harris and you will notice that his law firm never appears but his name does, does anyone want to know why?
If anyone has chosen to read some of my earlier posts, you will see that he was a part of Loch as a paid consultant for at least 3 years prior to the companies demise. You have also learned that he has played a part in a few of the "penny stock" firms whose management or promoters has strong ties to Loch as well.
I have spent the last 10 weeks in Washington, D.C. for my work not related to this mess but I have taken the time to ask certain questions to several department leaders in H.S., D.O.D., N.O., the F.D.A. and I am quite comfortable that the name CDEX is not a player in any areas of which these departments are looking at for product, advice, or ideas.
Some of the so-called promoters of Loch Harris, have in fact shot themselves in the foot by pointing out how "over and over" again the number of companies whose ideas patented or not is appearing in certain documents of the new company.
CDEX has went through close to 3 million dollars and what have they shown for it? I see around 11 updates on their website and applications for a grant for testing purposes. At this point anyone with a game plan could duplicate the success that CDEX has shown and not needed to spend 1 dollar.
Before all of you keep following the pied piper at least look into the CEO's past closer. Most of you have been led once by the nose but it does not have to happen twice. You can always use the shares as toilet paper or make paper dolls out of it.
Thank You
------------------------------------------------
By: ATXMAN
03 Dec 2003, 11:39 PM EST
Msg. 198652 of 239485
Jump to msg. #
Sact, sir as I am a expert witness in a case with W&S you learn a few facts. Glad to see you are connecting the dots to DH and MP. Have you ever wondered if they shared more than a ranch or two together, very interesting.
Thank You
AI
