CurAegis Technologies Inc (fka CRGS)

[allnumbers]

I agree that reporters should use full dates.

I wrote 2001 because that is the year that I thought it was reported. However, when I have time, I can try to find out what year it really was. When I first read that and posted it on this board ( it was within days from the original report ) I remembered it and wondered about the progress that they were making on it ever since. It is interesting that the G's have no recollection of it.

You must have the premium version of the I-Hub. Could you do a word search for my earlier posting of this same article?

The other post that you were referring to as old came from a blog. The blogs have a way of presenting as new information that is really quite old. I really need to be careful about that.

Incidentally, if this (six year old) report was true and really just issued today it would be more exciting than some of what is going on today.