InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 103
Posts 5740
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 03/17/2006

Re: papercut44 post# 1720

Wednesday, 06/27/2007 12:36:07 PM

Wednesday, June 27, 2007 12:36:07 PM

Post# of 4847
it was a huge deal the day it happened .......

basically what it boiled down to is he was promoting stocks he owned without specifying what he owned....

like when shakerz is paid to promote a stock he has to inform you he was paid and how much....

if he didnt it would be the same situation stockster.com faced.....

what made stockster.com different though is the owner spent nearly $2m in advertising his picks...

thats why it was so high profile......

DISCLAIMER: I AM A SERIES 3 LICENSED BROKER

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.