InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 363
Posts 100378
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/22/2006

Re: Bonga post# 272943

Sunday, 06/24/2007 4:25:58 PM

Sunday, June 24, 2007 4:25:58 PM

Post# of 311063
They were supposedly completed audited financials from a Big Four firm.
You are telling me that Petar knew better than the auditors from KPMG or PWC that the audits were in error?
When audits are issued and later determined to be in error a number of things must happen.
1. The auditor will request of sulja that all copies of the audited financials be returned.
2. The auditor will request that Sulja put out letters retracting the audited financials that were disseminated (copies may have been made).
3. The errors will be corrected and a new audit report issued indicating that this occurred and that these audited financials replace the erroneous financials issued earlier.

In the case of Sulja all of these steps were not carried out because PWC and KPMG denied any involvement with Sulja.

Lots of lies here on the part of Sulja.
imo