InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1549
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/20/2006

Re: tedwitt post# 43191

Saturday, 06/23/2007 12:54:32 PM

Saturday, June 23, 2007 12:54:32 PM

Post# of 79921
Here's another reason for being in a "quiet period..." that I hadn't thought of...it is effecting the pit lawsuit.

https://www.sttammanyclerk.org/liveapp/include/ImagePopup.Asp?WinCap=Image+for+Suit%23+200312894&DocID=3837512&PrnCap=Docket%23200312894&PrnMemo=Printed+from+Docket%23200312894

Mitchell is using estimates from PBLS PR’s about value of overburden (“$30,000,000”) as justification to get PBLS to pay royalty for it.

However, Furr is on testimony as saying he never valued the over burden before the PR and that before Phoenix, they would just give the stuff away. Also, before the $30M PR, Furr would come to the pit every day, see the hauling off of the over burden, and never asked for royalties for years. He also admitted that it’s not normal course for a royalty to be paid on it.

"Experience: that most brutal of teachers. But you learn, my God do you learn." C.S. Lewis
www.younglife.org

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.