InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,430.80
(
0.15%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.79
(
1.05%
)
Bitcoin
65,234.28
(
-1.88%
)
Post# of 18151
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

jking1999

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 2042
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2006

jking1999

Re: janice shell post# 6665

Friday, 06/22/2007 10:13:46 AM

Friday, June 22, 2007 10:13:46 AM

Post# of 18151
janice shell: I don't see how the judge will deny the receivership request.

RA damned himself on this by not changing the information about the postal association membership, one of the things the judge jumped all over, but more importantly, by not filing an 8-K for the summary judgement ruling. By not doing that, RA clearly showed that he has no intention of keeping investors apprised of the situation.

Not to mention all of the other points the SEC raised. But the failure to file an 8-K dooms him.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up