daViking,
I was not trying to "correct you" and I'm sorry if you took it that way. The point I was trying to make (and apparently didn't do a very good job at) was that they have been very frugal with their use of shares over the years, as evidenced by the low number of shares outstanding.
Yes, the number of Authorized shares increased upon the Shareholders' vote, but if they utilize the same care in the future as they have in the past, then it is not something to be concerned about -- at least not with this investor.
Again, I'm sorry for the confusion.
Have a good evening,
gktignol
