Response to LGL post 324
My sources, myself and most familiar with some of CCOP’s plans feel as follows:
1. In addition to more features/benefits, it’s also about speed!!! My source suggests, in addition to CCOP bringing more cost effective, safer and providing vastly superior benefits – look at the incredible difference in speed. Consumer Reports magazine shows to download a 5 gigabyte high definition movie, on DSL takes about 9 hours, on cable, 2-8 hours, on the best new fiber optic systems forthcoming – 17 minutes. If it’s true rumors that the confirmed speed of the intelligent antenna is more than twice as fast as the best fiber optic systems planned – you have got to factor CCOP’s likely speed advantage in, big time. How much faster than six times an intelligent antenna is compared to a commercial T-1 line remains a secret.
2. My source with many decades of experience indicates CCOP’s needs are handled both by announcements forthcoming soon that can’t yet be talked about (including, perhaps, activities by many large firms, which may be both investment banking and business to business related firms [selling the intelligent antennas to businesses to replace expensive, inferior T-1’s], many newsletters with excellent track records doing large mailings, etc.) and private placements that may cause significant benchmarks to occur, benefiting all shareholders.
3. CCOP has very different circumstances and products than VOIP companies like “I phone 2”, especially regarding CCOP’s supreme technological capabilities, profit margins, shares in float, share price, etc., all of which are being handled in vastly superior ways, due to an amazingly superior situation. (see upcoming releases)
4. CCOP provides superior broadband spectrum (and Ethernet) that makes enhanced VOIP, cable and super high speed Internet and other things work incredibly well – unlike most (almost all) other VOIP systems which have slow speed and bandwidth related problems. CCOP’s technology is so beyond other VOIP type systems it’s like comparing a new car to one made in the late 1800’s, powered by a steam boiler with a small firebox burning wood.
5. A lock down (something done when too many shares are in the float) would be extremely counter productive and ill advised for CCOP. Fortunately, most CCOP shareholders would enthusiastically vote both to bar any such unwise action, and more importantly, would likely vote to vigorously sue any shareholder (both as a company and as individual shareholders) that brought any non-beneficial, frivolous actions.
6. I concur with my source that CCOP’s possible withholding of press releases until announcements of however many tens of thousands of antennas have been commercially produced by Waylinks, and installed with entities contracting with CCOP, would have significant strategic and tactical advantages.
7. I think we should be talking in chat rooms about legitimate points and “comparing walnuts to walnuts, pecans to pecans, and similar things to similar things” which is opposite posting 324, which, other than comparing and contrasting very different situations, is mostly irrelevant to owners of CCOP.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
