The Jailhouse

[CAL_LAW]

chwdrhed: I was accused of mis-stating the FACT of your post.
I only reposted it to provide the poster with the source.
He thought it was a joke. I did not. You confirmed that you were not joking.

1. My attitude is controlled - if you review the posts, I don't slander and libel other posters or use profane/insulting language. You allow others to post that way - why? I want posters to post the truth/facts or clearly state that they are posting opinion. When they don't, I want to be able to point that out to other readers. If a poster says something now (contrary to their prior posts) why isn't their prior post (we call that an 'inconsistent statement') relevant? If there has been some intervening event, then the poster can and should explain.
2. Cassie will never be ignored, she invites the response she receives, and certainly not only from me. If she is so important to this site, so be it. Many others disagree. She is twisted and has the 'attitude.' We may disagree, but that is MY OPINION. If I cannot state my opinions here, why post?
3. I will not pay for the "privilege" of posting.

If you don't want Cal_Law here, that is your choice.

At this stage, there appears no more for me to say, so unless my posting privileges are fully restored, then I do not see any reason or purpose for posting further.