InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1923
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/15/2006

Re: solidgold post# 23159

Thursday, 06/07/2007 7:51:24 AM

Thursday, June 07, 2007 7:51:24 AM

Post# of 29237
In response from JB:

TJAK,



Please post this response to Sol.



In response to the strange calculations regarding the dividend as per the below.



AFTER THE DIVIDEND IS ISSUED THERE WILL BE 143M SHARES (5M THE NEW COMPANY
HAS CURRENTLY OUTSANDING + 138M THAT WE PTEL SHAREHOLDERS ARE RECEIVING)IN
THE NEW COMPANY. PTEL IS PAYING $7.5M ($1.50 PER SHARE STRIKE PRICE X 5M
SHARES CURRENTLY OUSTANDING) FOR THESE SHARES. 143M SHARES DIVIDED INTO
$7.5M PTEL IS PAYING = $ .052 MARKET VALUE PER SHARE OF THE NEW COMPANY.
THIS IS LIKE A FORWARD SPLIT.





Nice Math.



But are we not forgetting something here?



There is no cost associated with this transaction it is purely a stock exchange.



So the way I look at it is Petel is paying 5 million shares at $0.37 to the acquisition target which is a cost, in dilution or any other mechanism, of $1.85m to Petel and its share holders.



The acquisition target is paying 138 million shares to Petel at $1.50 which is a cost to the target of $207m.



There is only a 5 million share dilution to Petel share holders. The stock dividend in both directions is cost neutral so the dividend in stock to both parties is positive and far greater than $0.05.



Petel pays $1.85m and receives $207m.



Simply, little or no dilution to Petel, the Parent company, and significant dividends issued to all at no cost in the subsidiary to all share holders. How anyone can translate this into a forward split is beyond me. If the stock was issued 138 million to Petel and 138 million to the target, then I would agree but this is not the case.



My view is we as share holders get free unrestricted shares; even if they are at $0.20 they are free gratis. Alternatively if you don’t want the stock, any share holder is at liberty to refuse to accept them.







Finally as I am tired of all the bull that is continually posted about me. Yes I have filed under 144 some stock. I am and always have been restricted due to the 10% rule. I have held this stock in certificate form for nearly 1 year and in real terms for greater than 3. I have invested a lot in the company and kept it going out of my own pocket for many years. So to be honest, bearing in mind my restrictions shoot for me for actually taking something back. Also as you will note, there has been an absolutely devastating effect on the pps which continues to rise steadily, week after week…………………Go figure?



As the friend, which you promote on the boards, why be my friend when you want something and then always be the first to shoot me down publicly when you get the chance?



Sol, I have been a friend to you more than you will ever know, but enough is enough. So I wish you well and here is my very last gift to you.



Petel has received an offer on Medify Solutions which will phoenix the company through and IPO. The principles of the deal are very simple. Based on the TPP contract, a new corporation will be floated and all existing share holders in Petel will be given an equal number of shares to their current Petel holding in the newly formed Pink Sheet listed company. Now with that news, the progression of Petel, the dividends and a stock position for all share holders now in three floated companies all granted through a holding position in one company, then either the world is mad or as always stated, the shareholders will be rewarded. As I said, Christmas has arrived early. Surely no-one can complain about that, other than the usual suspects…………………

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.