BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[tommyb]

There will certainly be a lot of legal wrangling should someone test negative via RECAF but actually have cancer. But I have to wonder how this would be different from, say, an over-the-counter pregnancy test. Has anyone been sued because the test said they weren't pregnant, but actually were? Seems like a false negative result leaves you no worse off than if you hadn't taken the test at all, but I'm sure the lawyers will find ways to argue otherwise.