The Jailhouse

[CAL_LAW]

Cassandra and AKvetch, this is my last post to you.
Knowing that, I'm certain that you will post something (or many times) to try and invoke a response. I will not play your games.
Cassandra, as you will no doubt soon learn, it was YOUR postings on RB and here (along with your associate AKvetch) that each and both qualify as the illegal violation of privacy (not to mention other and actionable torts).
While I'm certain that you cannot fathom the quality of your breaches, some necessary legal reading is in your best interests. You seem to enjoy Find Law. That may be a good place to start. But, I do suggest that you consult with your legal counsel who will obviously be better prepared to educate you regarding this area of the law.
While information may be "available," the fact the you posted it and a "link" is the violation in and of itself. I did not consent to your posts and demanded that you retract them. I demanded that IHUB take action to remove the posts and not republish your violations. You and IHUB chose not to avail yourselves of that safe harbor. Not a wise choice, indeed.
I will no longer post to you or your alter egos/aliases. No doubt others will.
You have again passed the bounds of any reasonable conduct (remember your conduct on RB? - I certainly do).
I'm proud to be me - obviously you want to play hide and seek.
Fortunately, I can learn all I need to know - sources are many and eager.
And, legal and related resources are certainly at my beck and call.
Enjoy the ride. I plan to ;-0

This may be a good place to start;

Article I, section 1 of the California Constitution is an enumeration of the "inalienable rights" of all Californians. "Privacy" is declared to be among those rights. Typical of broad constitutional declarations of rights, the section does not define "privacy" or explain its relationship to other rights or interests. Nor does it specify how or against whom the right of privacy is to be safeguarded...In summary, the Privacy Initiative in article I, section 1 of the California Constitution creates a right of action against private as well as government entities.
As explained in Shulman, in addition to a tort cause of action for invasion of privacy, which can be pled on a number of different factual bases, there is also a separate constitutionally based cause of action for invasion of privacy. (Cal. Const., art. I, § 1;Shulman, supra.) The Supreme Court stated that the two sources of protection for privacy, common law and the state Constitution, are not unrelated. Specifically, the court explained that none of its prior decisions suggested that "the conceptual framework developed for resolving privacy claims under the California Constitution was intended to supplant the common law tort analysis or preclude its independent development." ( Ibid. )
"A 'reasonable' expectation of privacy is an objective entitlement founded on broadly based and widely accepted community norms," and "the presence or absence of opportunities to consent voluntarily to activities impacting privacy interests obviously affects the expectations of the participant."
Additionally, I strong urge you to review the laws of libel and slander and the related torts. It makes good reading and should also provide you with ideas on how to avoid the legal potholes some like to dig for themselves.
There is much more, but you need a legal education and that will take years.
By the way Cassandra, your choice of an alias speaks clearly about your intent:
"Cassandra-prophet of doom-Greek"
http://www.babynameworld.com/c.asp