Now, to review all that has happened the last few days.
Firstly, I was very tired last evening from a long day, so please do not grade my post(s)or make any decision on my comments using grammatical accuracy as a basis.
As you know, when dealing with non-reporting pinks it is necessary to periodically review ones data, and go over the verifiable facts known at that time.
Here is where we are imo;
Lets look at the holes in the original source(s) information.
Keep in mind that information has been gathered from several sources, so attempts must be made to place the pieces together and try to form a reasonable conclusion as to events occuring.
Ath this point in the process, it appears our original sources have provided us with a credible lead that so far has checked out, excepting the location of the subject target.
Original: AECH is going to merge with or acquire a large firm that is located in South America (SA).
Sources: My contacts and a person(s) close to AECH in some capacity.
Current: AECH is going to acquire a company located in Texas, the details are to be released in a PR, soon. We are to expect a release disclosing an LOI (Letter of Intent) with AECH as the acquiring Company. The LOI will expose the identity of the target Company and provide some information as to due dilegence ongoing, standard with such propositions.
.
Source: Officer/Director of AECH, brother of AECH CEO/Director.
Possible reasons for differences in original -vs- current info, that is,
1. That the target is in Texas, USA, as opposed to South America.
a. The financing source is from South America.
b. A person or firm in South America is providing advice or some type of financial backing
Now that is speculation of course, just trying to point out possible reasons for the only differences in our data.
2. Kenneth Eades is listed in Nevada filings as the sole Officer/Director on behalf of AECH.
Mr. Eades, an attorney who handles international business on occasion was the person who brought Mark Smith, well known shell operator, together with the Gomez clan in the shell transaction.
Mr. Eades simply acted as a proxy, and has no part in AECH operations and is not a shareholder.
Mr. Joseph Emas, of Miami, Florida, AECH legal counsel, is in the process of updating the Nevada filings to reflect the proper officers and directors.
Source: Officer/Director of AECH, brother of AECH CEO/Director
Comment: I will put a call into Mr. Emas today, to finally put this matter to rest.
Thank you for your time in reading this post, I know I post lengthy ones on occasion, I want everyone to read and think. I want input from everyone here, that is how we will make money here and other places, by putting our minds to work, and putting our thoughts together as one.
As information is compiled, sources verified, and such, our comfort levels either increase or decrease, that is the nature of this business.
This is true even with the large cap stocks, its just that the pinks/otc require more dd and constant verification in our minds as to what is occuring.
So far all has checked out and Company officials are available to comment.
As information get verified, and comfort levels increase, so do share prices, this one should be a real treat to be involved with as the information is checking out very well.
The share count verified, the float verified, the Minnesota financing firm verified, the AECH clients are listed on the PR's, the coming release of news, and so on.
I will update today if I get any more info, not nearly as busy with my personal business today, thank goodness. :)
AI
