InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,447.87
(
-0.31%
)
US TECH 100
18,982.40
(
-1.17%
)
Dow Jones
39,411.21
(
0.67%
)
Brent Oil
85.22
(
-0.06%
)
Bitcoin
61,350.00
(
1.81%
)
Post# of 203990
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (4) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (4) Next 10 Prev Next

AMA1

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 331
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/04/2005

AMA1

Re: xyz1002 post# 129007

Wednesday, 05/23/2007 5:26:18 PM

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 5:26:18 PM

Post# of 203990
xyz..fyi, An R/S is viewed negatively by the street. It's best used to shore up the pps of companies that are not generating any revenues. XKEM is generating revenues and should see a significant stream of revenues in the near term so, why do an r/s? Isn't a buy-back a better strategy?

We want to hold on to hold on to all our shares when this company is valued in the dollar range. What's wrong with that?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (4) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (4) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up