Intel Corp (INTC)

[chipguy]

Work on CSI is an onging effort. Plenty of work for another decade.

Yes, implementations in smaller and smaller feature size
processes and perhaps evolving phy technology represent
plenty of ongoing work for the lifetime of CSI. But the middle
and high level parts of CSI - semantics, protocols etc, won't.
That is what defines a communications link standard.

Why don't you do the SNR of this board a major favour and
leave engineering to engineers. Your FUD spreading efforts
have grown increasingly obtuse in recent days rendering
you little more than a troll.