InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.20
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,695.00
(
0.64%
)
Post# of 12660
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

iwfal

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 75
Posts 4682
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

iwfal

Member Level

Re: walldiver post# 3710

Sunday, 05/20/2007 11:06:54 AM

Sunday, May 20, 2007 11:06:54 AM

Post# of 12660
it's possible that they could set the alpha as high as 0.02 for the interim look. That's what I would do.

That is so wildly different than what I do I would ask your assumptions. I know at least one area where you and I differ is the assumed validity of the 9901/2a Cox Regression, but where else?

Are you assuming the HR seen in the CR is the 'correct' HR?

Are you assuming that the Ego effect is not real? That 9901 and 2a were flukes and in reality both have constant HR?

...
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up