InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,473.17
(
-0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,283.60
(
-0.64%
)
Dow Jones
39,134.76
(
0.77%
)
Brent Oil
84.91
(
-0.11%
)
Bitcoin
64,836.06
(
0.02%
)
Post# of 12660
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

steveporsche

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 283
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2006

steveporsche

Re: walldiver post# 3634

Sunday, 05/20/2007 3:51:08 AM

Sunday, May 20, 2007 3:51:08 AM

Post# of 12660
Thanks Wall, Clark and Ocyan for your responses to my questions. So, I guess the consensus at this time, assuming an interim at 180 deaths and a p value of .01 to .015, that the odds of the interim coming in significant are low (as we quess the SPA stands now), and the final at 360 death are probably good. This is the result of realtively immature survival data and the slow ramp up of enrollment. Is my understanding correct?

As an aside, attached is a dated article about Dr. No. Boy, does he talk out of both sides of his mouth. I can't stand him.


http://www.communityoncology.net/journal/articles/0201095.pdf
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up