InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253120
Next 10
Followers 9
Posts 957
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/16/2006

Re: DewDiligence post# 46970

Saturday, 05/19/2007 6:28:47 PM

Saturday, May 19, 2007 6:28:47 PM

Post# of 253120
"hence, lengthening the time to progression confers a very meaningful QoL benefit."

laughable statement. QOL measures the symptomatic, physical, psychological wellbeing and social functioning, wherease TTP measures the radiological component. Gemzar did not improve QOL so its label does not allow such a claim. The oncologists on ODAC voted 9-2 against approval, period, if that does not represent opinion of oncology community, I don't what does! Maybe they should invite CTGTAC to vote on ODAC?

Gemzar is a great drug- but in the case of ovarian, FDA bent its rule, the blame was conviently shifted to Von Eschenbach.

PGS and DEW should read the article below to hear the other side of the argument regarding the fallacy of delaying time to further chemotherapy.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ISW/is_280/ai_n16850472




Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.