InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 4693
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: walldiver post# 3630

Thursday, 05/17/2007 2:24:41 PM

Thursday, May 17, 2007 2:24:41 PM

Post# of 12660
Q: What factors led to the relatively poor results of 9902A?

A: Main reason was strong # of bone metastases factor favoring the placebo arm...secondary reason was smaller trial size.


True - but undoubtedly exagerated in the 9902a analysis. E.g. the bone met HR in 9901 was nowhere near as extreme. This is a large part of the reason for the huge change in p value for 02a.

One of the stratification factors in 9902B will be # of bone metastases...this and the much larger size of the trial should help balance out the likelihood of a higher % of placebo crossovers.

If you are doing Cox Regression anyway then randomization strat isn't worth a lot - except that it minimizes the difference between plain Log Rank and the Cox Regression. So the strat doesn't really mean much except that it minimizes the angst where the log rank fails and the CR passes.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.