How much of the shortfall in log rank p-value and HR is attributable to smaller size?
Very little. Trial size was only a small contributor.
The two biggest 'known' contributors were probably sicker population and imbalance. But there is probably something else going on as well - the imbalance probably isn't as severe as the published CR would lead one to believe.
If 9902B mirrors the combined 9901/9902A results, what might the results of 9902B using the SPA prespecified cox analysis look like at the interim and final?
My guess is that it is stat sig - but just barely. The reason that it is just barely is the effect that Ego brought up - the HR at less than 2 years is pretty low even with exactly the same patient pop as in 9901/2a. Remember that 9901/2a was p=0.011 at everyone 3 years. 02b will be only a few more deaths - but probably more than 50% of them will be at less than 2 years since randomization. So ...
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.