NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[yellowjacket]

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=19599778

Here's the proverbial straw...

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1022701/000114420407024204/v074206_10-q.htm

From p.55 of the first quarter 10-Q filed 5/10/07:

"Subsequent Stock Based Compensation Events

On April 12, 2007, NeoMedia entered into an agreement with Thornhill Capital LLC (“Thornhill”), an independent consultant, pursuant to which NeoMedia agreed to reprice up to 10,000,000 warrants held by Thornhill upon achievement of certain performance conditions. Upon signing of the agreement, which calls for the termination of any obligations due from NeoMedia to Thornhill under the terms of a previous consulting agreement between the parties and Thornhill’s commitment to assist with the development of the China market for NeoMedia’s technology products, 2,000,000 warrants were repriced from $0.227 to $0.048, 1,000,000 warrants were repriced from $0.11 to $0.048, and 500,000 warrants were repriced from $0.11 to $0.048. In addition, the following warrants could be subject to future repricing if certain milestones are met: (i) 2,000,000 warrants will be repriced from $0.227 to $0.048 upon execution of a contract outlining mutually agreed payment terms for amounts owed to NeoMedia by Automart, a customer of NeoMedia’s Micro Paint Repair business unit, (ii) 3,500,000 warrants will be repriced from $0.328 to $0.048 upon receipt of payment by NeoMedia from Automart, (iii) 500,000 warrants will be repriced from $0.11 to $0.048 on October 12, 2007 if Thornhill is still assisting with the development of the China market, and (iv) 500,000 warrants will be repriced from $0.11 to $0.048 on April 12, 2008 if Thornhill is still assisting with the development of the China market."

Mr. A. Refkin (Thornhill) deserves zero consideration for such a repricing in my opinion. His past role and future role remain questionable in my mind...no, completely suspect in my opinion. YJ.