If you ask nicely, the plaintiff's attorney may provide copies of the documents. Per OK rules, the onus for distribution falls on the submitter. The judge though can waive this when there's a lot of parties.
IMO each defendant ought to review or at least have access to all docs because it may influence his strategy or require him to defend himself. Say five defendants decide to blame 10 others as being Pino's accomplices. Without reviewing docs, they may not have a clue that happened until after the judge rules against them while dismissing everyone else.
-----
"We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful."
-- Warren Buffett