Petey
why wouldyou think Petresa over Socite PCI Chemi?
MBL
Posted by: Jack E-T
In reply to: pinkeyepete who wrote msg# 22601 Date:5/11/2007 4:17:43 PM
Post #of 22614
Pete, I looked at this a while back, I felt Petresa was too small to acommodate ACMG.
Posted by: Jack E-T
In reply to: None Date:4/13/2007 3:31:32 PM
Post #of 22604
Another possibility...I have studied the web site of the Bus. park in Becancour. All of the available sites that are listed don't fit the size stated by Dr. C. nor do any have an existing building on them. So, to negotiate a deal for a lot with a building already on it, Alcar would have to negotiate with owners of an existing lot, not the managers of the business park.
One other posibility sub lease a parcel of a large existing plant that has unused area of there plant as most companies will overbuy land to allow for expansion. One that fits this idea is Socite PCI Chemi Canada. It is located on 180 acres, so Alcar's megar 8 1/2 acres may not be a mojor imposition, area wise. As a bonus, a byproduct of PCI's process is Hydrogen. It just so happens that alcar needs hydrogen for their process. A win win for both companies. No transport cost of hydrogen for Alcar, Captured customer buying your hydrogen. I have seen simalar type arraingments along the ship channel industry here in Houston.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
