DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

loch3, Sorry, I didn't mean to ignore anything.

When you refer to your 'real point' I assume you mean your statement;

"I never bothered to read the posts that you referance to "stockpimpdaddy". I for one didn't feel the need. Why? Because the illiterate, bumbling effort by someone posing as Dr. Kondragunta persuaded me not to pay heed to such nonsense.
As I recall, many other posters were of the same opinion."

I understand completely. The butchered grammar and the obvious emotional content of the posts was a clear indicator that the poster had a personal axe to grind. It was quite easy and understandable to dismiss them out of hand.

However, (and this is the crux of the matter), someone at DNAP (or closely associated with DNAP) was concerned enough about 'the nonsense' to take a very risky and controversial course of action in order to counter the perceived threat of Kondragunta's ranting.

So whether or not you took the posts of eyecolor0 seriously, or if you therefore ignored the counter arguments of stockpimpdaddy, it does not make them any less a violation of SEC rules.

So, I understand your dismissal of the topic it is well justified, but it does not affect the seriousness of the issue.

regards,
frog