GZ6G Technologies Corp (GZIC)

[retribution]

Flawed Testing by a Third Party Produced Negative Report
There are a number of allegations about the DKL LifeGuard on the Internet. Although these allegations may appear to be independent criticisms, all of them stem from the same source, a brief and defective test of a prototype LifeGuard and a physical teardown of an instrument that were conducted eight years ago by the Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico. The early prototype LifeGuard that was tested never went into production, the test procedures violated the LifeGuard¢s operating instructions, the lab¢s mathematical analysis was incorrect and lab officials refused to report the results of a second test in which the LifeGuard performed flawlessly.
No scientific test is considered valid unless repetitive testing produces identical results. Every other operational and laboratory test of the DKL LifeGuard in the last six years - in the United States, Europe and Asia - has contradicted Sandia¢s findings. Not a single independent testing laboratory, university or government agency that has examined the LifeGuard for itself has found evidence to support Sandia¢s false and baseless allegations. It is worth noting that the Lockheed Martin Corp., which has developed and licensed a wide variety of sensor systems that compete directly with the DKL LifeGuard, manages Sandia.