Thanks Bethany.
If we read between the lines, MN1 has been in contact with Dr. C, since his email for missing the interview?
ACMG has changed TA because of BHUB?
Neither of the above would happen if Dr. C was fleeing and scamming.
MBL
Posted by: BethanyMAnderson
In reply to: qazwsx who wrote msg# 21033 Date:5/6/2007 8:14:55 PM
Post #of 21082
I did miss it, sorry.
It wasn't so much what the reporter was asking, but several things that I'm not sure I'm allowed to divulge. The ending of contact had nothing to do with ACMG business, if I can explain this as vaguely as possible, but more along the lines of displeasure regarding some comments made by someone else
Posted by: qazwsx
In reply to: qazwsx who wrote msg# 20823 Date:5/5/2007 12:08:01 AM
Post #of 21081
And If I read betwwen the lines what Beth of MN1 said yesterday that one of their reporters was in contact with Doc and still the overall scenario doesnt change tells me that Doc was not able to provide reasonable answers to the MN1 reporter's querries. That hancock guy on MN1 is an idiot but others at Mn1 seemed reasonable and were asking the right questions.
Beth can correct me if I have jumped to wrong conclusion here.
And this could be one of the reasons why no follow-up interview on MN1 because Doc would have gotten the same type of questions during live interview
