InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 711
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2005

Re: Tackler post# 75947

Saturday, 05/05/2007 8:06:23 PM

Saturday, May 05, 2007 8:06:23 PM

Post# of 159752
Compromise? How many times does he need to compromise? Is it his responsibility to compromise every time someone commits a criminal act and forges BCIT's shares? How many times would this "compromise" make, three?

As long as the brokers keep getting off the hook for their criminal behavior, the more they are going to continue that behavior. It must stop! Those that commit the crime must be held responsible and pay the price for that crime. Requiring the brokers to purchase shares on the open market is the only fair resolution to the problem as not only will they be required to make good those shares, they will incur a significant penalty as well.

Why would any logical, ethical person disagree with that? None would! Therefore I can only conclude that anyone advocating such a "compromise" is either not logical or is unethical. Which is it in your case?




Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.