InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 248
Posts 26046
Boards Moderated 13
Alias Born 06/14/2006

Re: ICEMAN1CO post# 11096

Tuesday, 05/01/2007 9:16:01 PM

Tuesday, May 01, 2007 9:16:01 PM

Post# of 44848
Interesting post icedevil

And you are INcorrect, I do believe it matters how the NASD letter came to be public.......it matters at this juncture.......the only thing that matters if the 11 Items listed in that letter have been complied with to the satisfaction of the NASD.........

IS WHY DID A PERSON PRIVY TO THE DOCUMENT AND INQUIRY MAKE THAT DOCUMENT AND INQUIRY PUBLIC!!!!!!!!

every shareholder here is going to care who leaked that letter if it ends up NOT resulting in a stock HALT or further investigation by the NASD or SEC........the CONTENTS of that letter and the 11 ITEMS HAVE EVERYTHING to do with who made it public AS WE ALREADY KNOW IT WAS APRTY TO THE DOCUMENT AND INQUIRY WHO LEAKED IT! AND WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE?

THIS MESSAGE YOUR ARE SENDING ICE AVOIDS THE VERY PROBLEM THAT IS OF IMPORTANCE RIGHT NOW ISNT IT?...OTHERWISE WHY WOULD THERE BE ANY OTHER PROBLEM??? i AM NOT AWARE OF ANY HALT PENDING OR NOT, NOR ARE YOU, AND NEITHER OF US HAS SEEN ANY LITIGATION DOCUMENTS TO PROVE THAT CASE EITHER?????

"If you get a flat tire on your car do you ignore the fact that you have a flat tire and go on a witch hunt to see who may have dropped a nail that punctured the tire.....or do you fix the tire?"

i would do both!!!!! dam straight son both!!!! i would not want to have to go through that again!!!
AND BTW I MIGHT NOT SAY ANYTHING TO ANYONE ABOUT WHAT I MAY OR MAY NOT DO TO THAT WITCH!

"At this point the FLAT tire is not being addressed or fixed......."

is it flat??????? again is there any proof that this inquiry is ongoing, or any lawsuit as alleged?

LETS SEE IT?!!!!

"it is being IGNORED by Mr.Berman and some people here"

everysingle shareholder should be

DEMANDING THAT YOU STOP TELLING THEM WHAT TO DO!!

and or telling berman what to do!

"I think Mr.Berman owes it to the shareholders who have been supporting his company to let them know the status since the letter is now public information..."

if it had never become public information then what??? lol this is a little weird wouldnt you say, just because a party to the inquiry leaks the document???

now that somehow???qualifies a confidential inquiry as being something he needs to address publicy????

"You can focus on who gave it to who etc.......but the primary focus should be for Mr.Berman to address the current status of it........failure to do so is a disservice to his shareholders and frankly very irresponsible of him to not update everyone."

why??? to prevent this rhetorical attack on his resposibility, credibility? The longer this goes on without action by NASD the easier it is to see who is trying to hide what.

"And while you are looking for who leaked it etc...I would be curious to know who traded the stock and knew about it before everyone else did? I wonder who got FAXES and unloaded positions here? so I do agree it would be INTERESTING to know who did have the information etc.........."

NOW WERE TALKING!!! YOU ARE DAM STRAIGHT CORRECT HERE \!!!

"but as it relates to current shareholders it matters not who leaked it"

WRONG, IT MATTERS IF THE INQUIRY IS DONE, AND THIS LETTER WAS USED TO MANIPULATE THE STOCK!!!!

"what will matter is if that letter comes back to haunt them in the form of further NASD or SEC action HALTING the stock or worse....and then each and every shareholder here will be wishing everyone banded together here to demand Mr.Berman updated them on that letter................instead of guessing PPS and or claims values when they dont even have a current GEO REPORT to my knowledge..............."

INTERESTING LANGUAGE, IF , THEN, WISHING, HAUNTING, TO MY KNOWLEDGE

"All Posts are my Opinion only.....Do Not BUY,SELL or HOLD based on anything I have stated..ever......Caution is advised as always..."

THATS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THAT MESSAGE FOR ME AND EVERYONE TO REMEMBER!!

Now , again i ask you, at what point in time are we not going to have to keep hashing and rehashing this old cereal?

how long without action from this inquiry do the shareholders have to or can expect you to accept there is no further action to be forthcoming?

opinions dont last forever in every case, eventually they are confirmed or denied, whats your limit? This is an opinion on this stock from you, i am asking for. it has been over a month now, in 8 days it would have been 2 months since berman spoke on the phone with nasd. these are the facts!

and the most curious of factS is the fact that someone privy to the inquiry leaked a confidential document and inquiry TO THE PUBLIC!