InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,880.76
(
0.94%
)
Post# of 159752
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

RDG013

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 95
Posts 32256
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/01/2001

RDG013

Member Level

Re: matrix post# 73764

Tuesday, 05/01/2007 3:41:21 PM

Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:41:21 PM

Post# of 159752
matrix, electronic trading records do at least show that no certs have been touched for me. As far as w/o prejudice, I understand this. I am betting that either the judge, the answers already in, or some other force led to the dismissal and by BCIT agreeing just to let it happen, they got the w/o prejudice.

I do not believe we will need to worry about those counts again.

"Once in a while you can get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right?"

- Jerry Garcia



Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up