InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 406
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2006

Re: frin90rz post# 3377

Monday, 04/30/2007 6:23:35 AM

Monday, April 30, 2007 6:23:35 AM

Post# of 21720
Oops, "qualified person", I meant to write.

If there's anyone left who is interested in making money on GPGD, the point I am trying to make is that a 43-101 is a Canadian reporting standard, and not a mining standard. Granted, GPGD didn't use Canadian National Instrument 43-101 language in their public relations notices, and they may or may not be able to file a technical report with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 language.

Whatever the case may be, a lack of 43-101 language, in and of itself, does not necessarily imply anything about the lack of quality of an assay result. There are other possible explanations for the discrepancy.

Some people have effectively used general ignorance and confusion on this issue to bash this stock. Congrats to them if they succeed, shame on the rest of you for letting them.