my email tonight from efgo... i have one post left before midnight and i just got the exact email.. its clear he is reading our posts and is just answering questions that he is allowed to answer, nothing more and nothing less.... the only diff is my email started with "gail"
it had all those "?" marks, as most appeared to be next to the "'" that i think he meant to hit.
i was going to post it anyway, as a board is here to share info.. but i see european did posted his/hers first.. just fyi,, i didnt take out the breaks in the line this time so that im not accused of an "alleged" email.. also, you will see in the middle, my response back to him or whoever.. so the first, 2nd and 3rd email is all intact...
Gail;
We are working hard on getting the town hall up and running so that
all official company FAQ answers can be placed there. The previous
management had a similar town hall on www.cashnow.net (Top right hand
corner you will see ?investors corner?) however the authorities told
us to shut it down as they viewed it as solicitation for buying our
stock. We are trying to figure out how to do the town hall so we
satisfy investors, and that we do not again get the authorities all
ruffled up.
I?m working from home and my mobile has not stopped ringing. People
are asking how come some of the IR e mails are signed and some are
not? The reason is when I?m using an office PC I have a signature line
set up on my email client. When I?m on the road or when I?m using our
web based email I don?t have the signature line set up so I usually
end the e mail with Regards or Cheers. Another question I received was
why there are typos or misspelled words? I have always tried to get
the information or answers out to shareholders in a quickest way
possible, especially if the line of question was pertaining to a
recent PR and it was during trading hours. So if I?m at the airport or
a cyber café I?ll use the fast webmail email or even send a reply from
my mobile phone. Ever tried typing on a telephone keypad when 1 key
represents 3 letters?
I was also asked why we were so dead set against having the ?other
businesses? like the coffee and bio tech included in the portfolio.
The main reason is that it is untrue. We were getting bombarded with
questions on bio tech and investors were getting angry that we
couldn?t answer the questions on our ?holdings?. I didn?t know how
else to tell them that these are not our holdings.
The other reason is we had 2 huge shareholders who made it clear that
they were dumping their stock as they see bio tech as a money pit and
they thought we were a sub prime business aggregator and a Forex
company. I managed to convince 1 to stay in but the other one sold.
(That was the day we had close to 1 billion volume) So it looks like 1
investor sold while the other one stayed. If they both dumped it would
have been a disaster. So we had a huge volume day and we never moved
on PPS. I think that?s what caused the stall. Huge sells and huge buys.
I?m working hard on getting the 2nd investor back but he?s bit
reserved as he likes to see news and progress on the company. He wants
to know where ?his CEO is? what ?circles he?s moving in? and he wants
to know and hear NEWS!
I think we will go back to 2 PRS a week which should keep everyone happy.
Thanks again and FYI I?m sending this to others who have requested to
receive emails.
Regards
--------------------------------------------
xxxxxxxx@verizon.net>:
> Ok, thx so much, ill make sure that they understand that "chub" is to
> be the only contact.. but some stray emails may be shareholders that
> are not aware of "investors hub" ihub for short..
>
> I am the moderator for efgo on www.stockwire.com it's a much quieter
> site as its newer, but I make sure to protect that topic there. I
> allow good and bad info, as all a moderator is supposed to do is keep
> the peace, not allow personal attacks, cursing,,etc.
>
> I have been in since .0014 and im long and strong,, not sold a drop.
> :'>
>
> Thx for the timely reply..
>
> Gail (and im called only1gail on ihub and gail on stockwire)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cashnowcorp@cashnow.com [mailto:cashnowcorp@cashnow.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 12:56 PM
> To: gibby206@verizon.net
> Subject: reply
>
> Gail;
>
> We do not recognize this ihub or any other similar websites as
> official or authorized websites of the company. All the info
> pertaining to our operations and corporate matters can be found at
> www.espritfinancialgroup.com www.cashnow.com .net and .org and
> www.pinksheets.com SYMBOL EFGO
>
> Our legal dept will not permit us to go there or to post anything
> there. We were getting a high volume of FAQ type calls to the IR and
> to the general telephone lines that were impeding our ability to do
> regular business. We decided that the best way to deal with this was
> to collect FAQ questions and e mail them to this ihub managers who
> would post for all to see. We asked also that a reference tread be
> posted as well for ease of find.
>
> We did visit this ihub to do a quality check and we noticed that our
> FAQ answers and our agreement was being ignored. We are not going to
> comment on the editing or censoring of our content as we can funnel
> our energy in other places to be more productive. Lets just say that
> this matter has been resolved and we identified 1 moderator ?Chub? who
> has agreed to post our FAQ replies AS IS and as issued by the company.
>
> We acknowledge that this ihub has a great following and that they can
> either assist a company a great deal or harm the company.
> Unfortunately we are the recipients of the later. As you know CHNW ?
> EFGO was mothballed from August 2005 to about October 2006 as we
> suffered through 4 separate hurricanes in FL and some other mishap.
> This ?company history FAQ? is another FAQ that we are working on and
> we will release it shortly. There was approximately 20,000 web pages
> and several hundred domain names that encompass Cash Now. Our
> webmaster is still trying to wrap his arms around this infrastructure.
> We thought we put everything away and were trying to just focus on the
> several core businesses the stakeholders funded from the mothball
> days.
>
> So when initial stakeholders see other ventures in EFGO they get all
> twisted out of shape even though those businesses are no longer part
> of EFGO. This creates a sell off the shorts cover and we are left
> pulling the hair out of our head. This is jut 1 small example but I
> can name at least several other instances where we are trying to
> achieve goal ?A? and some ihub poster thinks he?s also getting to goal
> ?A? only to achieve goal ?C? and us getting to goal ?B?.
>
> That small shareholder realizes what he did sells out and we are left
> holding the bag and to clean up the mess. We absolutely have no issue
> talking to minority shareholders and advising them of what is
> happening with the company but we do have an issue when someone?s
> actions (shareholder or otherwise) impedes our ability to do trade and
> commerce.
>
> I hope this answered your questions as we remain dedicated to
> providing our shareholders good accurate information regardless if the
> news is good or bad.
>
> Regards
>
happy halloween...
