InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 990
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2006

Re: bagfull post# 9387

Friday, 04/20/2007 9:52:20 AM

Friday, April 20, 2007 9:52:20 AM

Post# of 17133
bagfull

I don't know about your information on so called shorts, but I hear this all over every board as an excuse for a downward pps....

I know for a fact that retail can't short a stock below $5.00 with a few very small exceptions on a very very few brokerage companys allowing $3.00... again very very few...

this idea of everything being short is just not the case... market makers can short to make a market in a stock, but if anyone thinks that the shorting is for anyother purpose other than a corrupt pipe deal and naked shorting as a combination then they are in my opinion totally incorrect....

in a pipe deal that is skewed to corrupt naked shorting skemes this can be done... but unless the company in question has gone to one of those types of funding agents then blatant shorting of a stock selling in this pps range is just fiction... that is the difference, so if sfnn has done some kind of pipe deal within the last year or so I suspect that shorting is not an issue with the present pps situation... in my opinion...

Imirish...
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.