Regardless of what you say, your posts have certainly tried to "brush off" my arguments that refute your contentions.
You asked:
"Do you think HP and Softeq don't know EDIG is marketing the platform to others? Do you think that APS doesn't know EDIG is marketing the platform to others?"
My answer is that I believe that APS, Eclipse and Softeq/HP believe that their custom platforms are exlusive to them and not up for sale by e.Digital to their competitors.
You statement also said:
"Do you think HP and Softeq don't know EDIG is marketing the platform to others? Do you think that APS doesn't know EDIG is marketing the platform to others? Is there a mystery here? I don't think so. Your contention is that YOU know something, based on assumptions (!) you've made about the dealings and contracts between companies, of which you have no knowledge (firsthand or otherwise). You also appear to contend that all these other parties fail to see, and even fail to act on, what you propose is "actually" going on, i.e. unethical behavior. Laughable? You bet! The fact is, EDIG's business model is transparent, and on display for all to see, and ALL these other companies have no problem with it. You think you are smarter than all the other parties involved? My guess, and it's just a guess mind you, is "No friggin' way"! I don't need to brush off your arguments. The degree to which you are making yourself appear ridiculous is not, shall we say, insignificant? My "support" is the actions of all other parties involved. I'm shocked you can't understand that. JMO of course. No worries though. Perhaps owd3 will side with you."
AI
