InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,626.02
(
0.54%
)
US TECH 100
18,986.40
(
0.30%
)
Dow Jones
41,393.78
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
71.83
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
59,953.01
(
-0.09%
)
Post# of 12660
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

eagle-eye

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 24
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/27/2006

eagle-eye

Re: palindromy post# 2972

Saturday, 04/14/2007 6:57:35 PM

Saturday, April 14, 2007 6:57:35 PM

Post# of 12660
Scher, by giving his opinion, is not risking his reputation at all.

However, IMO, if a person wants to express there position on an issue in this case to Von E. that is fine. Call him or send him a letter. I really have to ask why did this "Letter" find its way into the public's eye? It strongly appeares he wanted it to become public, not very professional, IMO.

Also, why did Scher & Hussain vote "Yes" to safety? Does not make sense to me!
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up