InvestorsHub Logo

nez

Followers 17
Posts 1789
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2006

nez

Re: None

Friday, 04/13/2007 9:32:07 PM

Friday, April 13, 2007 9:32:07 PM

Post# of 56798
Folks,
Many are really trying to take advantage of this situation by gathering information previously unknown to them and then researching so they can add to their knowledge base.
I for one have turned up concepts, ideas, and other trading information of which I was previously ignorant. I can thank all of the people constructively and thoughtfully adding posts. There are many good posts but it is becoming increasingly difficult and time consuming to skip posts you know are petty, bickering, baiting or just stale and repeated information posted by disgruntled people judging from the tone of the answers.

My main problem is since the name of the original nuisance poster is contained in the post, if answered, then we are still is subjected, to a degree, to the useless or stale subject matter as it is contained in one form or another in the reply.
This negates, to an extent the utility of the ignore feature because the subject matter can’t be “filtered” by using keywords or something of the kind. I know the moderators have their hands more than full as it is so I would like to make a suggestion; lets just not answer or refer to the people who are not contributing anything but a verbal boxing match! This will benefit all of us in the event that we will need to know ASAP when the stock starts trading.


This situation is one very high speed, high flux situation and also one with a very high probability of an unpredictable outcome. IMO, we need all the lead time we can get and if the board is cluttered with irrelevant posts, we will likely miss something or at least be late noticing it.
This I guarantee, the MMs won’t miss any crucial developments.
With all the talk of bashers paid or otherwise, why chance humoring them or ensure they get paid. How often does one need to read the same thing before they realize this is either pure hate, jealousy or is being done intentionally to distract people? Why take the chance of playing into the hands of the negative?
My knowledge about MMs is all speculation but it is obvious how easy we will be distracted by a “cluttered” board. Maybe this is their intention and maybe those who are addicted to answering them are in league with them. More speculation but when I see answers over and over to people who are on ignore, it males me wonder.
I have no one specific in mind and I do applaud sincere attempts to defend the truth or debunk obvious lies. I myself have engaged in this type of thing but only for so many posts and never on a board this “electric.”
My suggestion is to not address them in any way, shape or form. This may help ID people with multi aliases as it may be easier to notice the well established rhetoric even under an alias. What follows are boards to debate attack and bash each other and far more vitriolic boards than the following.
JMO,
Nez

Bashers Against Full Time Members
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=771

Provocative Quotes (PVQ)
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=2355

Tower of Babel (tobl)
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=2174

Talk trash about..
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=8

Talkin' Mo Trash
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=11



Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
Benjamin Franklin

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.