DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

ustacud, BUDDY!

If you ARE one of the scant few then you are well aware that there are no 'breakthroughs' occuring here.

The attempt to compare the genomes of representative groups to determine the underlying relationship between areas of the genome to physical characteristics is 'turn the crank' science. There are countless labs all over the world doing exactly the same thing.

That they have marked out their own particular niche is not in question, but 'breakthrough' is not an applicable term.

So my point is; Anyone who thinks that they are witnessing a 'breakthrough' is incapable of assessing the underlying science. Simply because anyone who understands the science would never use such a ridiculous characterisation.

So which are you?