If those "facts" are the same "facts" that you have been spamming here for the past month, expect critical review. If these "facts" are "facts" submittied in company filings, they are already on the record. They have links here in the iBox, and are referred to frequently. If your motive as stated is to guide new investors to your point of view or protect them from the longs here, then the spamming of materials here over and over will be viewed critically.
If you believe longs are misleading the "public", I encourage you to address the content that you consider misleading SPECIFICALLY. Your approach has been to spam unrelated materials in follow-up "declarations" apparently to "win over" the public to your view of the world. You need to engage in discussion, not republish a POV that you have already stated and appears to be "talking points." If your stated viewpoint has merit it will ignite meaningful discussion. If not, it will lay there and not be responded to.
The point is... stay on the topic of the thread. I will add a personal observation. Your approach since arriving on this board has been to "call out" posters, like some childish gunfight at high noon. All that has done is polarize the regular posters on this board against you, not your POV. I doubt you could give away a bonifide $100 bill here now. Don't expect to receive overwhelming support for your POV from those you have "called out" repeatedly. It just will not be there. You are reaping what you have sown here. Use common sense instead of spamming this board and you will have a lot better luck IMO.
► Any comment provided is my personal assessment/opinion of the indicated stock. "When the gods wish to punish you, they grant your wishes. Therefore be careful of what you wish for."
AI
