InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 182
Posts 52115
Boards Moderated 11
Alias Born 12/20/2004

Re: nealgalt1 post# 228846

Saturday, 04/07/2007 8:26:16 PM

Saturday, April 07, 2007 8:26:16 PM

Post# of 315345
Muddy eyes would not do for astrophysicist would it.
Now if 'shorts' were included in that number then the slurry is indeed thickened. Due to the fact that naked shorts aren't proven to exist and no one would do short trades in the trillions either.
I thought the o/s was near 17 billion at the time. Too bad Winick/bkmp insist on non transparency when it comes to its shareholders.

S5