Yes, anything is 'possible', even for a company to slowly and steadily arise outta the low pennies, maintain, and even continue.
It's an unfortunate thing in the OTCBB that hardly 1% of all companies ever do this, and because of this it makes it that much more dillicult for the one good apple in the bushel.
No thanks in large part to our system as approved by the SEC, who allows shorting and worse yet, naked shorting to run rampant.
However, the CTUM chart clearly shows that (thanks to savvy management), shorts have NOT won their games played against CTUM.
No doubt, this is lent to the fact that CTUM management plays a good game, delivering the goods, as it should be, but is seldom ever done.
All companies experience setbacks (Chastang), but only the few are wise enough to 'hedge their bets' with even stronger cards (LTC).
The more obvious an excellent investment becomes, the more the people there will be who wants in. Until recently, CTUM has stayed under the radar, but we can clearly see how 'in the radar', uneducated 'detractors' become quick to employ their typical penny mentality tricks.
Amongst all the other great things that are the make-up of CTUM, one more that will soon be in our favor is that the further we get from pennyland, the less detractors there will be, as these elements rarely focus on high quality $1+ stocks, but rather the penny/subbie stocks (probably because their lack of strong fundamentals allow for this).
We CTUM shareholders are truly blessed with the intelligence, talents, and integrity of management, for pulling this company up and out of the mire than so many are imprisoned to, not just because of their often inadequate business plans, but also because of the flipper mentality (lack of loyalty), as well as the host of other obstacles ranging from the death-spiral financing to the SEC.
It comes to me as no small laugh when elements like Sekrah and Jagman call the balance sheet 'rotten' or 'ugly', but neglect to mention the BILLION DOLLAR industry that that 'rotten' or 'ugly' balance sheet has thus created a product for....as if nothing costs money.
I have to ask myself: Given the 'more than obvious and CONFIRMED' potential that LTC holds, to what extent is CTUM debt acceptable for this BILLION DOLLAR potential? $20M? $30M? $50M?
What????
CTUM debt is only $7M-$8M???
For ALL this well patented and protected technology? How can this be?
Has CTUM been receiving freebies?
Close, but not quite. CTUM snagged LTC from the world-reknowned O.E. Patton Institute of Welding, a non-capitalist country institute...developed and extensively tested in Ukraine, by CEO Donald Robbins, who has long maintain excellent relationships with key Ukraine officials.
Combine that fact with a management team that themselves have made great sacrifice as well as highly cost effective and efficient decisions, and the near impossible, actually becomes reality.
Kudos Don (and company). You all deserve (and will soon get) the respect of all Wall St., for a job well done!!!
AI
to make a million bucks over night" 
