Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:02:28 AM
How can the results NOT be materially different for 2006 vs. 2005?
They were running a net profit through 9 months vs. a loss in 2005. Revenues were also much much higher.
How can the 2006 10K results not be materially different from 2005?
It doesn't add up.
Regards
Recent CAPC News
- Form 8-K/A - Current report: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/07/2024 10:20:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/13/2024 08:39:09 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/14/2024 08:42:47 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2023 04:55:51 PM
FEATURED DBG Pays Off $1.3 Million in Convertible Notes, which Retires All of the Company's Convertible Notes • Nov 7, 2024 2:16 PM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • SMX • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. (OTC: RAKR) Announces Successful Implementation of 1.6 Million Liter Per Day Wastewater Treatment Project in Iraq • RAKR • Nov 7, 2024 8:30 AM
SBC Medical Group Holdings and MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies Announce Business Alliance • SBC • Nov 7, 2024 7:00 AM
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM